Skip to content

Why Play a Paladin in D&D?

Paladins. In the world of D&D they have always been a bit of an unusual class. As of yet, I am yet to meet a player who actually regularly plays a Paladin. As a class, they have a certain amount of stigma associated with them due to the old AD&D (Advanced Dungeons and Dragons) rules of yore, where they had to be lawful good, and were restrained beyond belief. If someone wanted to play a Paladin then they would effectively be determining the characters of the entire group based on what would naturally go with that class. The answer was simple. Nothing. Nothing went with a Paladin back then. This was up to, but not including, Dungeons and Dragons v.4.

Instead, when the later editions of Dungeons and Dragons came out, Paladins received a lot of love. Their abilities became more helpful in a group setting, and they even became better fighters. What is more, the oaths that Paladins could then take opened them up, meaning there was a lot more scope for players to be able to play the character they wanted to play, rather than having their hands forced by the rules.

Why play a Paladin? Well, Version 5 Paladins are, for want of a better word, really fun characters to play, and also really kind of badass at the same time.

For The Light

At Level 1, the Paladin is a pretty good healer and they just get better and better as the game progresses. Unlike the Cleric, the Paladin doesn’t use magic to heal. Instead, they have a pool of healing points which is their Paladin level times five. They can divide these out as they want, using up five to cure a disease or a poison, or using them one HP at a time to heal teammates.

Where this is not necessarily as effective as curing wounds with a Cleric, the Paladin does mean it is not 100% necessary to have a Cleric in the party. If there is a Cleric, then the Paladin can free the Cleric up to take other spells if they want. They can take other spells such as Sanctuary or Command, whilst having Spare the Dying as a cantrip, just to save people the Paladin can’t get to in time.

Why is this useful? The ability that gives the Paladin the healing prowess (Lay on Hands) is an ability and not a spell. This means that, as the Paladin grows in level, as they gain spell slots at level 2, they do not need to use one of those slots to heal. Instead, those slots can be used either for stronger abilities, or for the incredibly awesome Divine Smite and one of the key reasons to play a Paladin.

“I’ll Smite Thee”

Divine Smite is a level 2 Paladin ability that is jaw-droppingly good at high levels. For the sake of using up one spell slot, a Paladin may channel the power of all that is good through their weapon, imbuing it with pure divinity. It adds 2D8 damage to the weapon for that smite, and +1D8 for each spell level higher than 1st whose slot is taken up. This tops off at a maximum of 5D8, with an extra 1D8 damage against undead or fiends. That’s a whopping 6D8.

But wait – once the Paladin gets to 11th level, they gain an additional 1D8 damage on top of their standard attack. This can be added to Divine Smite. So, for those counting, that’s a maximum of 7D8 additional damage against undead or fiend enemies, and 6D8 against everyone else.

What this suddenly means is that a Paladin, on a single hit, can wipe out most challenge rating 3 or 4 monsters, without applying any weapon specific effects, with one lucky hit. It means that they can effectively end a fight with something CR 6 before it ever really begins by reducing it down so far that the fight becomes pointless. It means that, if the Paladin uses two attacks then it can destroy almost anything within two or three turns. Brutal, and amazingly effective.

Swearing To Uphold The Good

Of course, like all classes, being a Paladin really has its benefits later on in the game. These include the Oath of Devotion, Oath of the Ancients, and Oath of Vengeance in the base Player’s Handbook depending on what it is exactly that you want to play. All of these are sworn to uphold the good and comes with its own abilities at higher levels. Oath of Devotion, for instance, comes with Sacred Weapon, which allows you to add your Charisma modifier to attack rolls. Oath of the Ancients has bonuses against Fey creatures, allowing you to turn those. Oath of Vengeance allows you to be a little more lax with your alignment, doing good by any means necessary.

Where Paladins really get kicked up a notch, however, comes in Xanathar’s Guide to Everything, the supplement for D&D Version 5. These give more options as to why play a Paladin, with two new Oaths – Oath of Conquest and Oath of Redemption. The two new oaths are polar opposites to one another, with Conquest allowing you to become the incarnation of the Angel of Death and Redemption allowing you to become almost entirely indestructible.

Redemption is particularly interesting, as it turns the gameplay of D&D on its head. This is a character class that is almost entirely pacifist, allowing it to be (kind of) classified as a bit of a fluffy class. That is until someone tries to hit a Paladin with the Oath of Redemption once they reach the higher levels. Then good luck to them. A large chunk of that damage comes right back on to them.

Why Play A Paladin? Because They’re Badass Incarnate

I saw an amazing meme the other day that said, and I quote, “Lawful Good does not always mean Lawful Nice” and this could not be truer than with the new Paladin and all that they can stand for. Gone are the days of rules and restrictions, and here is the age of glorious battle for the rule of good. Not only can they heal in a way that makes them useful to have around, but they can fight and stand their ground better than a lot of the other classes out there. They can be the angel of mercy, or they can be the angel of death. The choice is out of the hands of the rules, and into the hands of the player.

I think it is safe to say that Paladins have had a bit of a refresh in these later versions of Dungeons and Dragons. They are no longer a class of highly specialised and restricted fighters, but instead have a whole host of abilities (passive and active) that not only make them forces to reckon with in the D&D world, but also really fun to play.

So, the question – what do you think of Paladins? Have you ever played one or have the urge to play one? Or have you always left them by the wayside? Let me know in the comments below.

If you enjoyed reading this
you may enjoy:
The Case For β€œFluffy” D&D Characters (For Bards and Monks)


  1. totally agree, Paladins in 5th Edition are total badasses. With the removal of the Lawful Good restriction your choce of deity is also wider, I can definitely see paladins of conquest tearing across Fearun in the name of Bane.

    Liked by 1 person

    • The Oath of Conquest is an awesome Oath. Really cool. Paladins with that Oath can deal a lot of damage as well. I can’t help but feel they were brought in purely to open the floor to the potential of Chaotic Neutral/Lawful Evil Paladins in D&D.

      Liked by 1 person

    • If I were to start a new campaign today as a player (I seem to always be a DM these days) then I would choose Redemption. They’re unusual and playing an essentially pacifist character would force the player to think outside the box. They can be violent, but they don’t get the same abilities if they are. Awesome characters.

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Having only started D&D in the last few years we used the basic characters that could be downloaded from the site. Since then we’ve all bought the players handbook and we all wish we had that from the start due to the wealth of character options. It wasn’t a waste though, as we were able to use the book to upgrade our characters in different paths to the free rules.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Oh, the Player’s Handbook is brilliant. There are a few classes in there that just get fleshed out. I also really like the monk, bard, and cleric options as well. The bard and monk, in particular, have come from being secondary characters to being able to not just hold their own but be real characters worth playing. I would recommend Xanathar’s Guide to Everything as well as there are even more options in there πŸ™‚

      What do you enjoy playing the most?

      Liked by 1 person

      • We have very limited experience so I’ve literally only tried one class and that is one used in our current campaign, the warrior. Since getting the handbook, I have now gone down the Eldritch Knight route, which is great fun (I’ve mainly taken complementary cantrips/spells such as true Strike and shield etc). Combined with the hill dwarf stats and some very lucky treasure rolls allowing me to buy full plate early, he is a total tank

        Liked by 1 person

  3. I have never played a Paladin. Not because any real issue with the rules. Smite evil and power attacking for all was a commonly used phrase in our 3.5 group. I think there was just some weird personality meta clash going on. I have also never played a half-orc. Probably for the same reason.

    Just out of interest what was your first character ever? And what edition?

    Liked by 1 person

    • I love half orcs πŸ™‚

      I was introduced to AD&D by my dad, who played it in university back in the early 80s. I was around 9 years old when he introduced it to me in the mid 90s so I can’t remember my very first character. It would have been a one shot campaign probably.

      What I can say though is that I used to have a half orc cleric and a halfling rogue I played quite a lot πŸ™‚



      • How cool must your dad have been? My parents hated D&D.

        My first character was a dwarven cleric called (sigh) Thorin Oakenshield. Not very original. AD&D πŸ˜€

        Liked by 1 person

        • Did he slay orcs and have a legend about having to use an oak log as a shield? πŸ™‚

          How awesome are AD&D clerics for first time players, right?


          • Ha ha. Yeah, certainly some sort of teenage geek homage to the Hobbit. Although I have always had a soft spot for dwarves. I appreciate their dedication and stoic resolve. Unlike haughty elves *spit*

            Liked by 1 person

  4. Interesting post. I also like that they are more flexible now than they were back when I was playing. Then there was the dreaded Anti-Paladin, lol.

    Yes, in the old days paladins could be a problem with group cohesion. Usually what I did as a DM is if it was going to be a campaign then we had a session where we made characters that could play in the campaign together and not derail it simply because they wouldn’t be able to tolerate each other. Seemed to work well enough.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Yeah, that’s what we did – the problem is that Paladins didn’t seem to want to fit. Instead we just kind of avoided the Paladin entirely as it restricted the rest of the group. Now, however, they complement the group entirely.

      Which version/s of D&D did you DM?

      Liked by 1 person

  5. I started out with the original game and was pretty heavily into DMing and playing until about 2012 or so I dabbled a little with 4th both as a player and DM, and I’ve played 5th a couple of times. Don’t really play much anymore, but if I happened to find the right local group I’d certainly be interested. Mostly play 40K these days, though I am playing a session in a recurring campaign of the Ravenloft board game this Friday. Enjoy the cooperative aspect of that game, even if there isn’t any roleplaying involved.

    Liked by 1 person

      • I find Ravenloft to be a cute little game that seems pretty easy to pick up, even for people who have never played D&D. You “explore” the edge of a tile, placing other tiles, and generating monsters and encounters, which are things like ghostly hands coming out of the wall and attacking you or a spear trap, etc.

        The adventure for the evening has a goal, which you have to work toward as a group with everyone winning or everyone losing, and you can play the adventures as an on-going campaign, which is what we are doing.

        All in all it is a pretty fun game so far.


  6. They have definitely got a great set role play opportunities.
    My problem has always been that I want to be a wandering ranger or a Conan like barbarian maybe it’s time to think about a new approach instead of staying to my staple tropes.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Ahh thank you πŸ™‚ that’s really cool πŸ™‚

      What do you think of D&D then? Something you can sink your teeth into or something you would rather leave by the wayside?

      Liked by 1 person

      • Oh no I really like d&d! That’s also the problem because I like many things. We also play warmachine and star wars x-wing which is nothing like D&D but as D&D asks for dedication and commitment. Meaning that at the moment D&D is indeed on the wayside lol πŸ˜‚ The other two (especially warmachine as I enjoy painting the miniature a lot) take up most of the time.

        Liked by 1 person

        • I know that pain well – at the moment I have a Gloomhaven campaign going, Star Wars: Destiny where my friends enter tournaments so I act as their training dummy, and a D&D campaign. It’s difficult fitting everything in!

          Liked by 1 person

  7. It’s been 25 years or so since I played D&D, so I do remember the disdain people had for paladins. Sounds like they finally got it right! That first-level healing ability is pretty good.

    Liked by 1 person

  8. While I have never played as a Paladin, I play with a guy who is absolutely obsessed. The problem is he always portrays them stereotipically, so I’ve never considered Paladins that great of a class until reading this. Now I think I may try the class out at some point in the future.

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: